— BleepingComputer (@BleepinComputer) July 7, 2022
My first reaction: WHAT. THE. FUCK?! Microsoft added this as feature 88883 in februrary 2022 to the Microsoft 365 roadmap, and I was pretty happy about this feature. Let’s take a look at this change.
The intention for this change was to add an extra layer of security in case that a user tried to open a downloaded file or an email attachment. The primary reason for this was, that Office documents with VBA were the main entry point for malware deployments. A highly customized email is sent to an employee with the goal, that the user opens the document. The embedded VBA code then is used to download and execute the malware.
Now, this highly wanted change is rolled back. IMHO there is only one reason for this: Customer complains about broken business processes. It’s that simple..
I’m not an InfoSec guy, but I know how to keep Ransomware gangs out of my network. There are three very efficient ways to do this:
Implement admin tiering, and avoid giving users admin permissions
Quarantine emails with attachments, and last, but not least
avoid to run unsighed office macros
Sure, you can allow users the use of Office documents with macros, but please make sure that these macros are signed with a proper code singing certicate, and stop allowing users to open documents with unsigned macros.
I really don’t get it why Microsoft is unable to push such an important change to the public. Of course, Microsoft isn’t responsible if Conti tears your store apart, but at least they could make it a little harder for you to let that happen…
No responsible person can tell me today “Sorry, we couldn’t do anything about this cyber attack”. But I also think that vendors should continue to turn off unsafe features. And if it breaks your business processes… yes, then you don’t deserve it any other way.
This posting is ~2 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
A customer used PRTG Network Monitor to notify him in case of account lockouts. This worked quite well until we implemented Admin Tiering. In order to get a mail notification in case of an account lockout, or other security-relevant events in Active Directory, I customized some scripts from my PowerShell dump.
The solution is pretty simple: I used the Task Planner to run a PowerShell script if a specific event id occurs. The events are generated in case of a various number of Active Directory events. You have to enable audit policy to get the needed events in the security event log. Take a look at Microsoft audit policy recommendations and enable what you need. I recommend to enable the stronger settings.
The implementation is pretty easy. Create a basic task and execute this task if a specific event occurs.
The action is “Start a program”, like in the following screenshot.
Save the task and then change the user, which is used to run this task, to SYSTEM.
Please note, that you run these scripts with SYSTEM privileges. So make sure that NO ONE can easily edit these scripts! Best way is to restrict it to specific domain admins, restrict access to your domain controllers etc!
Repeat these steps for each script and implement them on each domain controller.
This posting is ~3 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
Yesterday, I passed the first exam of the year. In this case the WatchGuards Network Security Essentials exam. The exam covers basic networking and firewalling skills, as well as the necessary knowledge to configure, manage, and monitor a WatchGuard Firebox. If you were familier with networking and firewalls in general, this exam is a “low hanging fruit”. I had to take it due to partner conditions.
WatchGuards offers a pretty good study guide for this exam which you can get for free.. The exam is delivered by Kryterion and can be taken in a test center or as online proctored exam.
The closed book exam consists of 70 questions. You have 2h and you need at least 70% to pass the exam. The exam covers six different topics:
Network and network security basics
Administration and setup
Monitoring, logging, and reporting
Networking and NAT
Policies, proxies, and security services
Authentication and VPN
I passed the exam with a some preparation (I’ve only used the study guide). As long as you have experience with WatchGuard firewalls, which is mandartory IMHO, it is sufficient to read the study guide a couple of times.
This posting is ~5 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
Using a password safe, or password management system, is not a best practice – it’s a common practice. I’m using KeePass for years, because it’s available for different platforms, it can be used offline, it is Open Source, and it is not bound to any cloud services. Keepass allows me securely store usernames, passwords, recovery codes etc. for different services and websites, and together with features like autotype, Keepass offers a plus security and convenience.
I use 2FA or MFA wherever I can. That’s the reason why I’m a big fan of SSH public key authentication. But SSH key handling is sometimes inconvenient. You simple don’t want to store your SSH private keys on a cloud drive, and you don’t want to store them on a USB stick, or distribute them over different devices. In the past, I stored my SSH private keys on a cloud-drive in an encrypted container. When I needed a key, I decrypted the container and was able to use them. But this solution was inconvenient.
So what to do?
AbsolutVision/ pixabay.com/ Pixybay License
While searching for a solution I stumbled over KeeAgent, which is a plugin for KeePass. Keeagent allows you to store SSH keys in a KeePass database. KeeAgent then acts as SSH agent. I’m using this with PuTTY and MobaXterm and it works like a charm.
Setup KeeAgent
All you need is KeePass 2.x and the KeeAgent plugin. After installing the plugin (simply put the plgx file into C:\Program Files (x86)\KeePass Password Safe 2\Plugins), you can create a new entry in your KeePass database.
The password is the SSH private key passphrase. Then add the public and private key file to the newly created keepass database entry.
The KeeAgent.settings entry will be added automatically. Jump to the “KeeAgent” tab.
If required, keys can be loaded automatically if the database is locked, or you can add them later using the menu “Extras > KeeAgent”. Not every database entry can be used with KeeAgent, you have to enable the first checkbox to allow KeeAgent to use a specific database entry.
I create a database entry for each key pair I want to use with KeeAgent. And I only add frequently used keys automatically to KeeAgent. I have tons of keys and 99% of them are only added if I need them.
With KeeAgent in place, I can start new SSH sessions and KeeAgent delivers the matching key. You can see this in this screenshot “…from agent”.
I really don’t want to miss KeePass and KeeAgent. It makes my life easier and more secure.
This posting is ~5 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
Yesterday, I got one of these mails from a customer that make you think “Ehm, no”.
Can you please enable the TPM on all VMs.
The customer
The short answer is “Ehm, no!”. But I’m a kind guy, so I added some explanation to my answer.
Let’s add some context around this topic. The Trusted Platform Module (TPM) is a cryptoprocessor that offers various functions. For example, BitLocker uses the TPM to protect encryption keys. But there are another pretty interesting Windows features that require a TPM: “Virtualization-based Security“, or VBS. In contrast to BitLocker, VBS might be a feature that you want to use inside a VM.
VBS, uses virtualization features to create an isolated and secure region of memory, that is separated from the normal operating system. VBS is required if you want to use Windows Defender Credential Guard, which protects secrets like NTLM password hashes or Kerberos ticket-granting tickets against block pass-the-hash or pass-the-ticket (PtH) attacks. VBS is also required when you want to use Windows Defender Exploit Guard, or Windows Defender Application Control.
Credential Guard, Exploit Guard, and Application Control require a TPM 2.0 (and some other stuff, like UEFI, and some CPU extensions).
So, just add the vTPM module to a VM and you are ready to go? Ehm… no.
Prerequisites – or pitfalls
There are some prerequisites that must be met to use a vTPM:
the guest OS you use must be either Windows Server 2016, 2019 or Windows 10
the ESXi hosts must be at least ESXi 6.7, and
the virtual machine must use UEFI firmware
Okay, no big deal. But there is a fourth prerequisite that must be met:
your vSphere environment is configured for virtual machine encryption
imgflip.com
And now things might get complicated… or expensive… or both.
Why do you need VM encryption when you want to add a vTPM?
The TPM can be used to securly store encryption keys. So the vTPM must offer a similar feature. In case of the vTPM, the data is written to the “Non-Volatile Secure Storage” of the VM. This is the .nvram file in the VM directory. To protect this data, the .nvram file is encrypted using the vSphere VM Encryption feature. In addition to the .nvram file, parts of the VMX file, the swap file, the vmware.log, and some other files are also encrypted. But not the VMDKs, except you decide to encrypt them.
Before you can start using VM encryption, you have to add a Key Management Server (KMS) to your vCenter. And you better you add a KMS cluster to your vCenter, because you don’t want that the KMS is a single point of failure. The vCenter Server requests keys from the KMS. The KMS generates and stores the keys, and passes them to third party systems, like the vCenter, using the Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP) 1.1
The KMS is not a part of the vCenter or of the PSC. It is a seperate solution you have to buy. The KMS must support KMIP 1.1. Take a look into the Key Management Server (KMS) compatibility documentation offered by VMware for supported KMS products.
Make sure that you think about administrator permissions, role-based access control (RBAC), or disaster recovery. When you have to deal with security, you don’t want to have users use a general, high priviedge administrator account. And think about disaster recovery! You won’t be able to start encrypted VMs, until you have re-established trust between your vCenter and your KMS (cluster). So be prepared, and do not implement a single KMS.
Summary
And this is why vTPM is nothing you simply enable on all VMs. Because it’s security. And security has to be done right.
Mike Foley has written two awesome blog posts about this topic. Make sure that you read them.
This posting is ~5 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
In May 2018, Citrix released their new Citrix Certified Expert – Networking certification, which completet the networking certification path at the upper end (blog post on training.citrix.com). The track starts with the Associate (CCA-N), the lower-level certification is a requirement for achieving the higher-level certification, continues with the Professional (CCP-N), and ends with the Expert (CCE-N) certification. This is pretty cool, and I’m very happy that Citrix now offers the CCE-N, because the expert-level certification was missing all the time.
kmicican/ pixabay.com/ Creative Commons CC0
Everything is cool… except you have passed exam 1Y0-351 to gain your CCP-N. In this case, you have to pass 1Y0-340 until Dec 31 2018. Otherwise you have to start with the CCA-N, after the validity period of your CCP-N is over (3y after passing the exam).
Bad move, Citrix, bad move. I’m really disappointed. I passed 1Y0-351 in Nov 2017, and now, 12 months later, I have to book, pay, and pass 1Y0-340 if I not want to start with a CCA-N in Nov 2020. Bad move, Citrix, bad move!
Exam 1Y0-340 is titled as “Citrix NetScaler Advanced Topics: Security, Management, and Optimization”, where as 1Y0-351 was titeld as “Citrix NetScaler 10.5 Essentials and Networking”. You can assume that more in-depth knowledge is needed to pass the exam, as it was necessary for 1Y0-351. Note the “Advanced Topics” in the exam title.
But what are these “advanced topics”? According to the exam prep guide, the perfect candidate for the 1Y0-340 exam can deploy and/or manage
Citrix NetScaler Application Firewall (AppFirewall) to secure application access in a Citrix NetScaler 12 environment, as well as
NetScaler Management and Analytics System (NMAS) to administer a Citrix NetScaler environment, or
The exam prep guide referres to the NetScaler documentation, as also to training material. Unfortunately I don’t have access to the newer training material, only to the training material from my CNS-220 course. But hey: At least we have tons of publically available NetScaler 12.0 documentation available!
The exam prep guide has a section in which Citrix outlines sections, objectives and references. You will find links to the NetScaler 12.0 documentation, as well as knowledge base articles, or blog posts. Go through it. Read it carefully!
The exam prep guide also outlines the section titles and weights. Two areas stand out:
Section 4: Attacks and Protections, and
Section 8: Managing and Monitoring NetScaler Instances
The section weights are directly map to the number of questions in the exam. If the exam has 60 questions, and section 4 has a weight of 21%, at least 12 questions will relate to “Attacks and Protections”.
How did it go?
First things first: I passed with a good score. The exam had 62 questions and I needed at least 62% to pass the exam. I passed with 82%. As a non-native English speaker that took the exam in a country where english is a foreign language, I got 30 minutes extra, resulting in 120 minutes for 62 questions. Plenty of time…
What should I say? It was a multiple choice test. Read the questions carefully. The exam guide did not lie to me. It came pretty close to the topics that were described in the guide. For most questions, my first “educated guess” was right. Sometimes, the least dumb answer seemed to be correct. ;)
It was a bit frustrating that Citrix has changed product names. NetScaler is no “Application Delivery Controller”, MAS is now known as “Citrix Application Delivery Management”. There was a button which showed a mapping table “old name – new name”.
If you are experienced with Citrix ADC deployments and configuration, I think the exam prep guide is enough to pass the exam.
This posting is ~5 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
A customer is running their PCs behind their VoIP phones. Nothing unusual, most VoIP phones I know have an embedded ethernet switch, so that you only need one cable to connect PC and VoIP phone to your network.
Martinelle/ pixabay.com/ Creative Commons CC0
As part of a network security project, my colleague and I implemented IEEE 802.1X port-based Network access control at one of our customers networks. The setup consists of multiple Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise OmniSwitches (6450-P10 and 6860/E) and Aruba ClearPass.
We noticed, that mac-address based authentication worked all the time, but 802.1x fails constantly if the client was connected to a VoIP phone (NEC DT700). The phones does not do any port authentication. We use a device classification rule and User Network Profiles to get them to their correct VLAN. But the connected PCs should do a 802.1x based port authentication.
Wireshark FTW!
We used Wireshark to take a look at the communication. We created a packet trace on a client behind a VoIP phone, and we mirrored the traffic of the port, to which the phone was connected. Our assumption was that the VoIP phones drop the EAP packets from the connected PC.
This is a packet trace from my ThinkPad X250 which was connected to the phone.
Patrick Terlisten/ vcloudnine.de/ Creative Commons CC0
You can see the repeating “Request, Identity” from the switch, and the answer from my laptop (Response, Identity). The destination for the response is a multicast mac-address. But this frame was not captured behind the VoIP phone! It was missing. On the packet trace, that was created my mirroring the switch port to which the phone was connected, the “Request, Identity” was seen, but not the “Response, Identity”. The phone was dropping the EAP packets of my laptop!
RTFM!
The customer called the company who was maintaining the phones. But they did not understood our problem, so they enabled 802.1x on the phones. We disabled this instantly again.
I decided to take a look into the manual of the NEC DT700 and I found a point called “EAPoL forwarding” in the advanced network settings. After enabling this setting, EAP started working instantly.
Patrick Terlisten/ vcloudnine.de/ Creative Commons CC0
This is again a packet trace from my laptop, taken while it was connected to a VoIP phone. As you can see, the last EAP packet is “Success”!
This posting is ~5 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
In January 2017, I wrote an article about how to protect your WordPress blog using the WP Fail2Ban plugin, fail2ban on your Linux/ FreeBSD host, and CloudFlare. Back then, the fail2ban was using the CloudFlare API V1, which was already deprecated since November 2016.
Free-Photos/ pixabay.com/ Creative Commons CC0
Although the actions were updated later to use CloudFlare API V4, I still had problems with the unbaning of IP addresses. IP addresses were banned, but the unban action failed.
This is the unban action, which is included in fail2ban (taken from fail2ban-0.10.3.1 which is shipped with FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p10):
I found the solution at serverfault.com. The only difference is an additional tr -d ‘\n’ in the last line of the statement. Kudos to Jake for fixing this!
To prevent the action file to being overwritten, you should copy the original cloudflare.conf located in the action.d directory, e.g. to mycloudflare.conf , and use the copied action file in your fail definition.
This posting is ~5 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
This is just a short, but interesting blog post. When you have to troubleshoot authentication failures in a network that uses Windows Network Policy Server (NPS), the Windows event log is absolutely indispensable. The event log offers everything you need. The success and failure event log entries include all necessary information to get you back on track. If failure events would be logged…
geralt/ pixabay.com/ Creative Commons CC0
Today, I was playing with Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise OmniSwitches and Access Guardian in my lab. Access Guardian refers to the some OmniSwitch security functions that work together to provide a dynamic, proactive network security solution:
Universal Network Profile (UNP)
Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA)
Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)
Captive Portal
Quarantine Manager and Remediation (QMR)
I have planned to publish some blog posts about Access Guardian in the future, because it is a pretty interesting topic. So stay tuned. :)
802.1x was no big deal, mac-based authentication failed. Okay, let’s take a look into the event log of the NPS… okay, there are the success events for my 802.1x authentication… but where are the failed login attempts? Not a single one was logged. A short Google search showed me the right direction.
Failed logon/ logoff events were not logged
In this case, the NPS role was installed on a Windows Server 2016 domain controller. And it was a german installation, so the output of the commands is also in german. If you have an OS installed in english, you must replace “Netzwerkrichtlinienserver” with “Network Policy Server”.
Right-click the PowerShell Icon and open it as Administrator. Check the current settings:
Windows PowerShell
Copyright (C) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
PS C:\Windows\system32> auditpol /get /subcategory:"Netzwerkrichtlinienserver"
Systemüberwachungsrichtlinie
Kategorie/Unterkategorie Einstellung
An-/Abmeldung
Netzwerkrichtlinienserver Erfolg
As you can see, only successful logon and logoff events were logged.
PS C:\Windows\system32> auditpol /set /subcategory:"Netzwerkrichtlinienserver" /success:enable /failure:enable
Der Befehl wurde erfolgreich ausgeführt.
PS C:\Windows\system32> auditpol /get /subcategory:"Netzwerkrichtlinienserver"
Systemüberwachungsrichtlinie
Kategorie/Unterkategorie Einstellung
An-/Abmeldung
Netzwerkrichtlinienserver Erfolg und Fehler
The option /success:enable /failure:enable activeates the logging of successful and failed logon and logoff attempts.
This posting is ~5 years years old. You should keep this in mind. IT is a short living business. This information might be outdated.
Sometimes you have to replace SSL certificates instead of updating them, e.g. if you switch from a web server SSL certificate to a wildcard certificate. The latter was my job today. In my case, the SSL certificate was used in a Microsoft Exchange 2016 deployment, and the NetScaler configuration was using multiple virtual servers. I’m using this little script for my NetScaler/ Exchange deployments.
skylarvision/ pixabay.com/ Creative Commons CC0
When using multiple virtual servers, replacing a SSL certificate using the GUI can be challenging, because you have to navigate multiple sites, click here, click there etc. Using the CLI, the same task is much easier und faster. I like the Lean mindset, so I’m trying to avoid “waste”, in this case, “waste of time”.
Update or replace?
There is a difference between updating or replacing of certificates. When using the same CSR and key as for the expired certificate, you can update the certificate. If you use a new certificate/ key pair, you have to replace it. Replacing a certificate includes the unbinding of the old, and binding the new certificate.
Replacing a certificate
The new certificate usually comes as a PFX (PKCS#12) file. After importing it, you have to install (create) a new certificate/ key pair.
You should check what NetScaler software release you are running. There is a bug, which is fixed in 12.0 build 57.X, which causes the NetScaler appliance to crash if a SSL certificate is unbound and a SSL transaction is running. Check CTX230965 for more details.
To change your privacy setting, e.g. granting or withdrawing consent, click here:
Settings
